Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365454

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of initiating medical abortions in a large, academic emergency department (ED) in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective case series analysis was conducted to evaluate a protocol for initiating medical abortion in the ED implemented from January 2020 to October 2023 at an academic, tertiary care hospital in California, USA. Participants included ED patients diagnosed with pregnancies in the first trimester that were undesired and who opted for medical abortion. The medical abortion protocol was collaboratively designed by a multidisciplinary team and follow-up was conducted by our institution's gynaecology department. Data were sourced from a data repository of electronic health records and subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 eligible patients initiated medical abortions in the ED during the study period. The cohort was diverse in terms of racial and ethnic backgrounds and almost evenly split between private and public insurance. No patients had significant complications identified in the medical record. Two patients required uterine aspiration by the gynaecology team; one patient in clinic and one during a return visit to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this case series suggest that initiating medical abortion in the ED is feasible. The ED may be considered as an additional access point for abortion care services, especially in areas where other care options are not readily available. Educational, legal and regulatory frameworks that allow emergency physicians to take a greater role in providing this care should be considered.

2.
AJP Rep ; 14(1): e16-e18, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38269122

RESUMEN

Objective The four initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pregnant women presenting at term gestation to our institution presented with transaminitis. Three of the four were diagnosed with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (IHCP). Growing evidence exists of an associated transaminitis in nonpregnant SARS-CoV-2 patients. However, there are limited data of hepatic involvement of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy, and no previous studies have assessed the association with IHCP in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Study Design This was a retrospective, single-center case series of four consecutive pregnant women with a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 presenting with transaminitis in third trimester. Results The clinical courses of four pregnant women with COVID-19 and transaminitis, three of four of whom were diagnosed with IHCP, are described. Testing for SARS-CoV-2 was done through a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test of a nasopharyngeal swab. Conclusion As we await larger studies ascertaining the incidence of IHCP in SARS-CoV-2, this prevalence highlights the importance of diagnosing IHCP among women with COVID-19 as a potential etiology of transaminitis, as IHCP risks may be ameliorated with earlier delivery. Moreover, delineating a hepatobiliary association in pregnancy may provide further information about the mechanism of liver impairment in SARS-CoV-2 in all patients.

4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(6): 1357-1364, 2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk difference of uterine rupture when using current mifepristone and misoprostol regimens for second-trimester abortion among individuals with prior cesarean birth compared with those without prior cesarean birth. DATA SOURCES: We searched the terms second trimester, induction, mifepristone, and abortion in PubMed, EMBASE, POPLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane Library from inception until December 2022. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials and observational studies including a mixed cohort, with and without uterine scar, of individuals at 14-28 weeks of gestation who used mifepristone and misoprostol to end a pregnancy or to manage a fetal death. We excluded case reports, narrative reviews, and studies not published in English. Two reviewers independently screened studies. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Absolute risks with binomial CIs were calculated from pooled data. Using R software, we estimated total risk difference by the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method without continuity correction. For studies with zero events, a continuity correction of 0.5 was applied for individual risk differences and plotted graphically with forest plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with Higgins I2 statistics. Funnel plot assessed for publication bias. Of 198 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria: seven randomized trials (n=923) and 15 observational studies (n=6,195). Uterine rupture risk with prior cesarean birth was 1.1% (10/874) (95% CI 0.6-2.1) and without prior cesarean birth was 0.01% (2/6,244) (95% CI 0.0-0.12). The risk difference was 1.23% (95% CI 0.46-2.00, I2 =0%). Of the 12 reported uterine ruptures, three resulted in hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture with mifepristone and misoprostol use during second-trimester induction abortion is rare, with the risk increased to 1% in individuals with prior cesarean birth. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022302626.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Misoprostol , Rotura Uterina , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Mifepristona/efectos adversos , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Rotura Uterina/inducido químicamente , Rotura Uterina/epidemiología , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Aborto Inducido/métodos
5.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 35(6): 484-489, 2023 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37610990

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The emergency department serves as an essential access point for a variety of healthcare services. This review will examine the recent expansion of family planning and reproductive health services in the emergency department. RECENT FINDINGS: An increasing number of patients present to emergency departments for early pregnancy loss (EPL), abortion care, and contraceptive management. Availability of comprehensive EPL management varies dramatically, possibly due to lack of provider knowledge or training. Particularly in remote settings, educational interventions - such as providing information about medication management and training in uterine aspiration - may standardize this management. Restrictive abortion laws raise concerns for changing and increased patient presentations to the emergency department for complications related to unsafe or self-managed abortion. Emergency medicine providers should anticipate that more patients will present without a prior ultrasound confirming intrauterine pregnancy prior to initiating no-touch or self-managed abortions. Particularly among pediatric patients, there may be a role for contraceptive counseling during an emergency department visit. Novel strategies, including web-based interventions and emergency department-based curricula for contraceptive counseling, may help reach those who otherwise may not seek reproductive healthcare in a clinic setting. SUMMARY: The intersection of emergency medicine and reproductive healthcare is a promising frontier for providing immediate, patient-centered, family planning care. Continued research and provider education are necessary to refine these approaches, address disparities, and respond to the changing reproductive healthcare landscape.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Espontáneo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Servicios de Planificación Familiar , Reproducción , Educación Sexual , Anticonceptivos
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 142(3): 652-659, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37535962

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the implications of potential national abortion ban scenarios on the incidence of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to predict the incidence of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects and related outcomes in the United States under four theoretical national abortion bans: 1) abortion restrictions in existence immediately before the June 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, 2) 20 weeks of gestation, 3) 13 weeks of gestation, and 4) a complete abortion ban. The model included incidence of live births of neonates with single-ventricle cardiac defects, neonatal heart surgery (including heart transplant and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), and neonatal death. Cohort size was based on national pregnancy incidence and different algorithm decision point probabilities were aggregated from the existing literature. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted with 10,000 iterations per model. RESULTS: In the scenario before the Dobbs decision, an estimated 6,369,000 annual pregnancies in the United States resulted in 1,006 annual cases of single-ventricle cardiac defects. Under a complete abortion ban, the model predicted a 53.7% increase in single-ventricle cardiac defects, or an additional 9 cases per 100,000 live births. This increase would result in an additional 531 neonatal heart surgeries, 16 heart transplants, 77 ECMO utilizations, and 102 neonatal deaths annually. More restrictive gestational age-based bans are predicted to confer increases in cases of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects and related adverse outcomes as well. CONCLUSION: Universal abortion bans are estimated to increase the incidence of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects, associated morbidity, and resource utilization. States considering limiting abortion should consider the implications on the resources required to care for increasing number of children that will be born with significant and complex medical needs, including those with congenital heart disease.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Espontáneo , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Muerte Perinatal , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Niño , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Edad Gestacional , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Aborto Legal
8.
Nervenarzt ; 94(12): 1123-1128, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594495

RESUMEN

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is of exceptional importance in the diagnostics and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, a close interdisciplinary cooperation between neurologists in private practice, (neuro)radiological practices, hospitals or specialized MS centers is only rarely established. In particular, there is a lack of standardized MRI protocols for image acquisition as well as established quality parameters, which guarantee the comparability of MRI records; however, this is a fundamental prerequisite for an effective application of MRI in the treatment of MS patients, e.g., for making the diagnosis or treatment monitoring. To address these challenges a group of neurologists and (neuro)radiologists developed a consensus proposal for standardization of image acquisition, interpretation and transmission of results and for improvement in interdisciplinary cooperation. This pilot project in the metropolitan area of Essen used a modified Delphi process and was based on the most up to date scientific knowledge. The recommendation takes the medical, economic, temporal and practical aspects of MRI in MS into consideration. The model of interdisciplinary cooperation between radiologists and neurologists with the aim of a regional standardization of MRI could serve as an example for other regions of Germany in order to optimize MRI for MS.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Consenso , Proyectos Piloto , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neurólogos
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 141(6): 1115-1123, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37486652

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess cabergoline's efficacy at decreasing breast symptoms after second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, block-randomized superiority trial comparing cabergoline 1 mg once to placebo for preventing bothersome breast engorgement after second-trimester uterine evacuation. We enrolled pregnant people at 18-28 weeks of gestation who were English- or Spanish-speaking and without contraindication to the study drug. Participants completed a validated, piloted, electronic survey at baseline and at multiple timepoints through 2 weeks postprocedure to assess breast symptoms, side effects, and bother. Our primary outcome was any breast symptoms (a composite of engorgement, milk leakage, tenderness, and need for pain relief) on day 4; we planned to enroll 80 patients to show a 30% difference in breast symptoms (80% power, α=0.049). A subgroup of participants returned for serum prolactin levels. RESULTS: After screening 150 patients from April 2021 to June 2022, we enrolled 73 participants. Baseline demographics were balanced between groups: median gestational age was 21 weeks (range 18-26 weeks), 56.2% of participants were nulliparous, 34.2% self-identified as Hispanic, and 37.0% had public insurance. At baseline, reported breast symptoms were similar between groups. Among 69 participants who returned surveys on day 4, significantly fewer participants receiving cabergoline reported any breast symptoms compared with placebo (27.8% vs 97.0%, P<.001) (primary outcome) and fewer reported significant bother (2.8% vs 33.3%, P=.001) (secondary outcome). These differences persisted through day 14. Reported incidence and severity of bother from side effects were similar between groups: most common were constipation, fatigue, and headache. Serum prolactin levels were similar at baseline. On day 4, mean serum prolactin level was 6.5 ng/mL (SD 2.2) for those who received cabergoline and 18.0 ng/mL (SD 5.9) for placebo (P=.049). CONCLUSION: Cabergoline is an effective and well-tolerated strategy to prevent breast symptoms after second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04701333.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Aborto Espontáneo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Cabergolina/uso terapéutico , Cabergolina/farmacología , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Prolactina/farmacología , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos , Lactancia , Método Doble Ciego
10.
Anesth Analg ; 137(2): 345-353, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729414

RESUMEN

Although most abortion care takes place in the office setting, anesthesiologists are often asked to provide anesthesia for the 1% of abortions that take place later, in the second trimester. Changes in federal and state regulations surrounding abortion services may result in an increase in second-trimester abortions due to barriers to accessing care. The need for interstate travel will reduce access and delay care for everyone, given limited appointment capacity in states that continue to support bodily autonomy. Therefore, anesthesiologists may be increasingly involved in care for these patients. There are multiple, unique anesthetic considerations to provide safe and compassionate care to patients undergoing second-trimester abortion. First, a multiday cervical preparation involving cervical osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents results in a time-sensitive, nonelective procedure, which should not be delayed or canceled due to risk of fetal expulsion in the preoperative area. In addition, a growing body of literature suggests that the older anesthesia dogma that all pregnant patients require rapid-sequence induction and an endotracheal tube can be abandoned, and that deep sedation without intubation is safe and often preferable for this patient population through 24 weeks of gestation. Finally, concomitant substance use disorders, preoperative pain from cervical preparation, and intraoperative management of uterine atony in a uterus that does not yet have mature oxytocin receptors require additional consideration.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Anestésicos , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/métodos
13.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 228(1): 55.e1-55.e9, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964661

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Initiating a progestin-based contraceptive before the drop in progesterone required to start lactogenesis stage II could theoretically affect lactation. Previous studies have shown that initiating progestin-based contraception in the postnatal period before birth-hospitalization discharge has no detrimental effects on breastfeeding initiation or continuation compared with outpatient interval initiation. However, there are currently no breastfeeding data on the impact of initiating the etonogestrel contraceptive implant in the early postnatal period immediately in the delivery room. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of delivery room vs delayed birth-hospitalization contraceptive etonogestrel implant insertion on breastfeeding outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a noninferiority randomized controlled trial to determine if time to lactogenesis stage II (initiation of copious milk secretion) differs by timing of etonogestrel implant insertion during the birth-hospitalization. We randomly assigned pregnant people to insertion at 0 to 2 hours (delivery room) vs 24 to 48 hours (delayed) postdelivery. Participants intended to breastfeed, desired a contraceptive implant for postpartum contraception, were fluent in English or Spanish, and had no allergy or contraindication to the etonogestrel implant. We collected demographic information and breastfeeding intentions at enrollment. Onset of lactogenesis stage II was assessed daily using a validated tool. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in time to lactogenesis stage II was defined as 12 hours in a per-protocol analysis. Additional electronic surveys collected data on breastfeeding and contraceptive continuation at 2 and 4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 95 participants; 77 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (n=38 in the delivery room group and n=39 in the delayed group) after excluding 18 because of withdrawing consent, changing contraceptive or breastfeeding plans, or failing to provide primary outcome data. A total of 69 participants were included in the as-treated analysis (n=35 delivery room, n=34 delayed); 8 participants who received the etonogestrel implant outside the protocol windows were excluded, and 2 participants from the delivery room group received the etonogestrel implant at 24 to 48 hours and were analyzed with the delayed group. Participants were similar between groups in age, gestational age, and previous breastfeeding experience. Delivery room insertion was noninferior to delayed birth-hospitalization insertion in time to lactogenesis stage II (delivery room [mean±standard deviation], 65±25 hours; delayed, 73±61 hours; mean difference, -9 hours; 95% confidence interval, -27 to 10). Onset of lactogenesis stage II by postpartum day 3 was not significantly different between the groups. Lactation failure occurred in 5.5% (n=2) participants in the delayed group. Ongoing breastfeeding rates did not differ between the groups, with decreasing rates of any/exclusive breastfeeding over the first postpartum year. Most people continued to use the implant at 12 months, which did not differ by group. CONCLUSION: Delivery room insertion of the contraceptive etonogestrel implant does not delay the onset of lactogenesis when compared with initiation later in the birth-hospitalization and therefore should be offered routinely as part of person-centered postpartum contraceptive counseling, regardless of breastfeeding intentions.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Anticonceptivos Femeninos , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Progestinas , Periodo Posparto , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización
15.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 34(6): 351-358, 2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36165024

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will focus on those who are at greatest risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity from a subsequent unplanned or short interval pregnancy and the interventions to increase contraceptive uptake in the postpartum period. RECENT FINDINGS: Populations at highest risk of maternal or neonatal morbidity - those with a history of preterm birth or those with complex medical conditions - are also those at the highest risk for unintended pregnancies attributed to low-efficacy contraceptive failure/ noncontraceptive use, and many are discharged from birth hospitalization without understanding the importance of birth spacing related to their high-risk pregnancies. Current innovative strategies to improve postpartum contraception access and uptake among high-risk populations include utilizing the antenatal period to initiate contraception counseling, developing multidisciplinary teams, and incorporating multimedia-based educational tools. However, ongoing challenges that continue to pose barriers to contraception access include racial and economic disparities and the restructuring of obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. SUMMARY: Preventing an unintended short interval pregnancy by providing contraception in the postpartum period is one of the most modifiable risk factors for those at highest risk of subsequent maternal or neonatal morbidity and therefore should be prioritized by clinicians, hospitals, and insurance coverage.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nacimiento Prematuro , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Embarazo , Pandemias , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Anticoncepción , Periodo Posparto , Conducta Anticonceptiva
16.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 34(6): 359-366, 2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36036465

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: This review focuses on patients who are most likely to experience morbidity associated with second trimester abortion care and risk mitigation strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Prior cesarean birth, particularly multiple prior cesarean births, is the most significant risk factor associated with complications during second trimester abortion because of increased risks of hemorrhage, with or without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), and distorted anatomy, which increases the risk of uterine perforation. Recent data suggests that first trimester ultrasound findings may be predictive of PAS, including multiple lacunae, abnormal uteroplacental interface, and hypervascularity. Multiple common medications interact with mifepristone and are therefore contraindicated; ulipristal shares mifepristone's selective progesterone receptor modulator activity but does not share the same metabolic pathway. Recent data suggests ulipristal may be an effective adjunct for cervical preparation, avoiding potentially mifepristone's drug-drug interactions. Those ending a pregnancy due to severe early-onset hypertensive disorders have a high rate of clinically significant thrombocytopenia: platelet transfusion is recommended for those with platelets <50 000 per cubic millimeter. SUMMARY: Pregnant people presenting for care in the second trimester may have conditions that make an abortion more technically or medically complex. Clinicians can mitigate much of this increased risk with preprocedural planning, and appropriate intra-operative preparedness.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Placenta Accreta , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Mifepristona/uso terapéutico , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/efectos adversos
17.
Am J Perinatol ; 2022 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35576967

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the likelihood of assessing all mandated fetal views during the second-trimester anatomy ultrasound prior to the proposed federal 20-week abortion ban. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of a random sample of 1,983 patients undergoing anatomy ultrasound in 2017 at a tertiary referral center. The difference in proportion of incomplete anatomic surveys prior compared with after 20-week gestation was analyzed using X 2 and adjusted logistic regression; difference in mean days elapsed from anomaly diagnosis to termination tested using t-tests and survival analysis. RESULTS: Incomplete views were more likely with initial ultrasound before 20 weeks (adjusted relative risk: 1.70; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-1.94); 43.5% versus 26.1% were incomplete before and after 20 weeks, respectively. Fetal structural anomalies were identified in 6.4% (n = 127/1,983) scans, with 38.0% (n = 49) identified at follow-up after initial scan was incomplete. 22.8% (n = 29) with an anomaly terminated. CONCLUSIONS: A complete assessment of fetal views during an anatomy ultrasound prior to 20-week gestation is often not technically feasible. Legislation limiting abortion to this gestational age would greatly impact patient's ability to make informed choices about their pregnancies. KEY POINTS: · It is often not technically possible to complete anatomy ultrasound prior to 20-week gestation.. · Often, anomalies are missed during early, incomplete anatomy ultrasounds.. · After the diagnosis of a structural anomaly, one in five chose to terminate the pregnancy..

19.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 33(6): 445-452, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534995

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe barriers to provision of postpartum permanent contraception at patient, hospital, and insurance levels. RECENT FINDINGS: Permanent contraception remains the most commonly used form of contraception in the United States with the majority of procedures performed during birth-hospitalization. Many people live in regions with a high Catholic hospital market share where individual contraceptive plans may be refused based on religious doctrine. Obesity should not preclude an individual from receiving a postpartum tubal ligation as recent studies find that operative time is clinically similar with no increased risk of complications in obese compared with nonobese people. The largest barrier to provision of permanent contraception remains the federally mandated consent for sterilization for those with Medicaid insurance. State variation in enforcement of the Medicaid policy additionally contributes to unequal access and physician reimbursement. Although significant barriers exist in policy that will take time to improve, hospital-based interventions, such as listing postpartum tubal ligation as an 'urgent' procedure or scheduling interval laparoscopic salpingectomy prior to birth-hospitalization discharge can make a significant impact in actualization of desired permanent contraception for patients. SUMMARY: Unfulfilled requests for permanent contraception result in higher rates of unintended pregnancies, loss of self-efficacy, and higher costs. Hospital and federal policy should protect vulnerable populations while not preventing provision of desired contraception.


Asunto(s)
Periodo Posparto , Esterilización Tubaria , Anticoncepción , Femenino , Humanos , Políticas , Embarazo , Esterilización Reproductiva , Estados Unidos
20.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 64(3): 449-459, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34323227

RESUMEN

Access to first trimester abortions has increased significantly in the past few decades in low and middle-income countries. Manual vacuum aspiration is now standard of care for procedural abortion and postabortion care. Medication abortion has shifted abortions to being performed earlier in pregnancy and is becoming more widely available with new service delivery strategies to broaden access. Widespread availability of misoprostol has made abortions induced outside of the formal medical sector overall safer. In both legally restrictive and supportive environments, there is increased interested in self-managed abortions as part of a shift towards demedicalizing abortion through task-sharing.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Misoprostol , Países en Desarrollo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Legrado por Aspiración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...